Start Free Trial
← All posts
Access at work

Live captioning as a workplace accommodation

A workday is meetings, huddles, all-hands, phone calls, and rooms. How to request captions that cover all of it — and where CART and AI each fit.

5 work formats covered 7 min read Published August 2026

The accommodation conversation usually starts with a form and stalls on a question: what, exactly, should we provide? For a deaf or hard-of-hearing employee the honest answer is rarely one thing, because a workday is not one thing — it is scheduled meetings, drive-by huddles, quarterly all-hands, phone calls with vendors, and a colleague leaning over the desk. Live captioning is one of the few accommodations that covers all of it — provided it is set up as a tool the employee controls, not a feature someone else has to remember to switch on. Here is how to request it, and how to choose between CART and AI.

The accommodation has to cover where work actually happens

Most captioning conversations at work begin and end with the video platform. Zoom, Teams, and Meet all offer some form of captions, and for scheduled calls on one platform they may be enough. But map an actual week and the platform's share of it shrinks fast:

  • Scheduled video meetings — the easy case, and still uneven: caption quality and language support vary by platform and plan.
  • Impromptu huddles — the Slack huddle, the hallway exchange that becomes a decision, the "quick call?" that starts in thirty seconds. No scheduling window, no captioner booked.
  • All-hands and town halls — often streamed through different software than daily meetings, with panel audio and audience questions.
  • Phone calls — vendors, customers, recruiters. The phone still ships no captions at all.
  • In-person conversations — the desk drive-by, the one-on-one over coffee, the front-desk exchange.

An accommodation tied to one platform covers a slice of this. The request should be scoped to the barrier — understanding speech at work — not to one piece of software.

Framing the request: the interactive process

In the US, workplace accommodations are typically worked out through what the ADA framework calls the interactive process — a structured conversation where the employee describes the barrier, the employer explores options, and both land on something effective and workable. Similar processes exist in many other countries. Two things make it go well from the employee's side.

First, describe situations, not audiology. "I miss decisions made in huddles and can't take vendor calls without a colleague" gives HR something to solve; a hearing threshold does not. Second, arrive with a specific, low-friction proposal. An accommodation that requires no scheduling, no per-meeting setup by others, and no IT project is dramatically easier to say yes to.

Practical orientation, not legal advice. Accommodation law varies by country and situation, and this guide is educational. For the legal contours of captioning obligations, see our overview of ADA captioning requirements; for your own case, talk to HR, an advocate, or counsel.

What to put in the accommodation request

Name the barrier in scenes

List the recurring situations where speech is lost: huddles, all-hands, phone calls, noisy in-person exchanges. Concrete scenes anchor the whole process and make the eventual accommodation testable — did it fix these, or not?

Propose the tool and the license

Ask for a live captioning tool the employee runs themselves — one that captions any audio the computer can hear, so it covers every format above without anyone else doing anything. Ask for a paid seat, budgeted by the company like any other work software.

Answer IT's questions up front

Security review is where accommodation requests go to wait. Shorten it: state where audio goes, whether anything is stored, and which compliance attestations the vendor holds. A tool that stores nothing has a much shorter conversation ahead of it.

Propose a trial period

Two weeks of real use beats a procurement debate. Agree that the scenes from step one are the test, then review together: did captions cover them? Most objections resolve themselves against actual experience.

CART or AI captioning — or both

CART — a trained human captioner writing in real time — and AI captioning are not rivals so much as different shapes of coverage. The honest comparison:

CART (human captioner)AI captioning
SchedulingBooked in advance, per sessionAlways available — covers the unscheduled part of the day
Best atHigh-stakes formal events: legal, disciplinary, board-levelVolume and spontaneity: daily meetings, huddles, calls
Cost shapeHourly, per eventFlat monthly subscription
JudgmentA human rides through crosstalk, sarcasm, chaosHandles jargon well with a custom dictionary; no human judgment

Many employees end up with both: CART booked for the events where every word is load-bearing, AI captioning running for everything else. The full trade-off analysis is in our CART vs AI captioning comparison.

For managers and HR: what makes it actually work

The difference between an accommodation on paper and access in practice is mostly operational habit. The pitfalls are predictable:

Treating platform captions as the whole answer. They cover scheduled calls on that platform — not huddles, phones, or rooms.
Making the employee re-request per meeting. The accommodation is a standing tool, not a favor renewed weekly.
Routing it through per-event approvals. If captions require a ticket, they will not exist for the meeting that starts in two minutes.
Forgetting that audio quality is a team behavior. One microphone per speaker, one voice at a time, agendas in writing — cheap habits that raise caption accuracy for everyone.

Teams that get this right usually notice a side effect: captions quietly help hearing colleagues too — the non-native speaker, the person dialing in from a loud café, the multilingual team that reads faster than it listens.

Frequently asked

What is a reasonable accommodation for a deaf employee in meetings?

Common options include live captioning (CART or AI), sign language interpreters, written agendas and notes, and preferred seating. Live captioning is often central because it covers the most formats — video meetings, huddles, phone calls, and in-person conversation. What counts as reasonable is worked out case by case through the interactive process between employee and employer; this is practical orientation, not legal advice.

How do I ask my employer for live captions at work?

Describe the specific situations where you miss speech — huddles, all-hands, phone calls — then propose a specific tool and a two-week trial. A self-serve AI captioning tool like Unicaption is easy to approve because it needs no scheduling, joins nothing, and stores nothing: audio is never stored and transcripts are deleted when the session ends. The free tier gives you 30 minutes every week, so you can demonstrate it working before anyone signs off.

Is AI captioning good enough to replace CART at work?

For high-stakes, scheduled events — legal, disciplinary, board-level — many deaf professionals still prefer CART's human judgment. For the daily volume of meetings, huddles, and calls, AI captioning at state-of-the-art streaming accuracy with a custom dictionary for company terms covers what CART cannot practically be booked for. Many employees use both, and the employer funds both.

Do live captions work for phone calls and in-person conversations at work?

Yes. A tool that reads the computer's audio captions any call taken on the computer — softphone, VoIP, messenger — and a microphone source captions in-person conversation when the laptop or phone sits between the speakers. Unicaption supports both sources, in 60+ languages with optional live translation shown beside the original.

One accommodation, every conversation

Live captions for meetings, huddles, calls, and rooms — run by you, stored nowhere. 30 free minutes every week, no credit card.

Start Free Trial →