It depends, and the dependencies are knowable. Six factors that move accuracy, the errors to watch for, and a way to measure it for your own use.
People ask AI assistants this question expecting a percentage. The honest answer has none, because live translation is two systems chained together, speech recognition and then translation, and each one's errors compound. Quality swings widely with the audio, the languages, and the subject. This guide lays out the six factors that matter, the failure patterns to expect, and a fair test to run so you know how accurate it is for your situation rather than for someone's demo.
Background noise, distance from the microphone, echo, and compressed call audio degrade recognition first, and everything downstream inherits the errors.
Widely used pairs usually do better than rare ones. Results for a given pair also vary by direction.
Names, product terms, medical, legal, and technical language are where general models slip. A custom dictionary helps.
Fast speech, accents, dialect, code-switching, and overlapping speakers all cost accuracy.
Everyday conversation is easier than dense specialist content, idioms, and humor.
Showing text faster can mean less context, which can mean more corrections. Tools trade speed against stability differently.
Vendor accuracy percentages usually come from clean test audio in major languages. They are real measurements of something, but not necessarily of your meeting. The standard metric is word error rate, which has its own limits; see word error rate explained. More useful than any headline number is how the tool performs on your own speakers, topics, and terminology.
Tips for improving results on any system are in 10 ways to improve live caption accuracy.
Unicaption doesn't publish a single accuracy figure, because no honest one exists. It is built to make errors easier to catch and fix.
Run the test above on the free plan: 30 minutes every week, no credit card.
It depends on audio quality, language pair, vocabulary, and speaking style, so no single number is honest. It can be very good on clear audio and common topics and weaker on names, numbers, jargon, and accents. Test it on your own recordings, as you can with Unicaption's free plan.
Not on its own. For medical, legal, immigration, or financial conversations, a qualified human interpreter is the standard, and AI works best as support. See the guide on when not to use AI interpreting.
Wrong or dropped names and numbers, missed negations, literal handling of idioms, and plausible but incorrect technical terms. Reading the original beside the translation helps catch them.
Use a good headset microphone, have one person speak at a time, load your names and terms into a custom dictionary, and choose the correct spoken language. Unicaption supports a custom dictionary and shows the original beside the translation.
Side-by-side original and translation. 30 free minutes every week.
Start Free Trial →