The category isn't the risk; the specific tool's data handling is. What to ask before a sensitive meeting, and what a good answer looks like.
The reflexive answers, yes it's fine and no never, are both wrong. AI live translation tools differ enormously in what they do with your audio and words, and that difference is the whole question. One tool may stream audio, translate it, and discard everything. Another may record the meeting, store a transcript indefinitely, and use content to improve its models. Before a confidential meeting, you need the answers to a small set of specific questions. Here they are, with what to look for.
Some tools keep recordings; others process audio live and keep nothing. The answer should be stated plainly in the privacy policy.
Ask where transcripts live, who can open them, and whether they're deleted automatically when the session ends or only when you delete them.
This is a separate question from storage. Look for an explicit statement that your content is not used for training.
A visible participant changes the room, may breach meeting rules, and often records. A tool that listens on your own device does not join.
Ask about encryption in transit and for the session itself, and what the vendor can access.
Tools may rely on other companies for speech recognition or translation. A good vendor can tell you what data goes where.
The most important question isn't about the tool. NDAs, client policies, and professional codes may restrict any outside tool.
Even a very private tool is a decision to disclose. Many professional settings expect you to tell the people involved when you use an assistive tool, and some prohibit it. Recording laws vary by place, and a tool that only displays live text is different from one that records, but this is practical orientation, not legal advice. For interpreters, the fuller framework is in interpreter confidentiality and AI tools and the interpreter code of ethics.
Unicaption is a real-time captioning and translation copilot designed around not keeping things. Here is what it states, and nothing more.
Unicaption does not claim HIPAA, SOC 2, or GDPR compliance or certification. If your organization requires a specific certification, treat that as a separate requirement and ask your compliance team. For the broader risk picture, see when not to use AI interpreting.
It depends on the tool: whether it stores audio or transcripts, trains on content, joins the call as a bot, and what your contract allows. Unicaption is end-to-end encrypted, never stores audio, deletes transcripts when the session ends, never trains on content, and joins nothing.
Some tools do and some don't. Check the privacy policy for audio and transcript retention. Unicaption never stores audio and deletes transcripts at the end of the session.
Privacy is one question and accuracy is another. Even with a private tool, high-stakes legal and medical conversations should rely on a qualified human interpreter, with AI at most as support. See the guide on when not to use AI interpreting.
Often it is good practice and sometimes a rule, depending on your profession, your client, and local law. Check your contracts and professional code. This is practical orientation, not legal advice.
No bot, audio never stored. 30 free minutes every week.
Start Free Trial →